Authenticity in Northanger Abbey Essay -- Northanger Abbey

Northanger AbbeyAuthenticity In what is for Jane Austen an uncharacteristic all in ally direct intervention, the narrator of Northanger Abbey remarks near the end The anxiety, which in the defer of their attachment must be the portion of Henry and Catherine, and of all who loved either, as to its final event, plenty hardly extend, I fear, to the bosom of my readers, who will check over in the tell-tale compression of the pages before them, that we are all hastening together to perfect felicity. As far as I know this is the only overt credit Austen ever makes to the material nature of her medium, and the relationship of that materiality to generic conventions. She might as well have said This is a romantic comedy Im piece of committal to writing as announce that the happy-ending conclusion was foregone. In terms of audience reception -- surprise, suspense, narrative deferral -- the advantage of writing film scripts (as distinct from TV, whose audience can tell when the end is nigh simply by looking at its collective watch) is that there is no tell-tale compression of pages your viewers dont know when the end is coming. If youre writing scripts for, say, Blue Heelers, you make them forty-eight minutes long and no mucking about, and the imminence of narrative closure is obvious to everybody. The advantage of being a novelist is that you can conciliate where you want to stop. One of the biggest differences between Austens novels and their current screen versions -- two of which were written for TV -- is that Emma Thompsons screenplay for Sense and Sensibility, Nick Dears for Persuasion and Andrew Davies for Pride and Prejudice -- unlike all of the originals -- were circumscribed first and last by material constraints For the si... ...als, journalists and fans in period costumes (mostly about forty years out, the ubiquitous crinoline doing duty as a blanket signifier of historical dress-ups) arrived at the gates of the MCG in variously anachronistic hors e-drawn vehicles and vintage cars with Coke logos on them. precisely just how deep and wide the late twentieth centurys nostalgia for authenticity really goes, and just how problematic and paradoxical a notion it has become in its tendency to make us forget history rather than remember it was demonstrated in Tasmania on the afternoon of Sunday April 28, when many of the tourists at Port Arthur mistook parade reality for a harmless facsimile of a deadly past -- one of those re-enactment things -- and began hurrying towards the gunshots, instead of away. Works CitedAusten, Jane. Northanger Abbey. Ed. Claire Grogan. New York Broadview, 2002.

Human Rights Issues in Malaysia Essay -- Human Rights

forgiving rights violations occur on a daily basis in Malaysia. Recently, according to the Associated Press in an article published in The Hindu, an estimated 25,000 protestors rallied on the streets of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, demanding electoral reforms prior to the next national polls (Associted Press, 2012). Police fired tear gas and water trussed with stinging chemicals into the crowd of protestors as retaliation to violation of pre-set barriers by the protestors (Associted Press, 2012). However, prior to that, there were several hours of peaceful protest. Authorities stated that the demonstrators had no right to commit Independent Square, a symbolically important venue that hosts parades and high-profile celebrations as their protest site (Associted Press, 2012). Activists feel that the Election Commission is prejudiced citing falsified voter registration lists and concerns regarding crown Minister Najib Razaks ruling coalition having an unfair upper hand in the electio ns. (Associted Press, 2012). Although elections do not need to be held until mid-2013, previous rumors state that Najib whitethorn dissolve Parliament next month and seek a new mandate in June. Other demands include longer campaigning times and absentee right to vote problems, and although Foreign Minister Anifah Aman admits that there are issues, officials feel that many of these concerns are exaggerated (Associted Press, 2012). Although protest concerns merit consideration, primarily, what this event demonstrates is the continued disregard for basic human race rights and freedoms in Malaysia. Clearly, government response to this protest supports the rejection of basic human rights and freedoms to Malaysian citizens. Additionally, a previous protest in July 2011 also di... ...rg/news/2012/01/23/malaysia-promises-reform-unfulfilledHuman Rights Watch. (2012). World Report 2012 Malaysia. Retrieved April 30, 2012, from Human Rights Watch http//www.hrw.org/world-report-2012/world -report-2012-malaysiaPichai, U. (2010, March 25). Malaysian government urged to end abuse of migrant workers. Retrieved May 8, 2012, from Mizzima News http//www.mizzima.com/news/regional/3722-malaysian-government-urged-to-end-abuse-of-migrant-workers.htmlThe Sydney good morning Harold. (2012, April 29). Xenophon caught in Malaysia protests. Retrieved April 29, 2012, from The Sydney Morning Harold http//www.smh.com.au/national/xenophon-caught-in-malaysia-protests-20120429-1xsjb.htmlThompson, J. (July, 25 2011). Australia, Malaysia sign refugee deal. Retrieved May 7, 2012, from ABC News http//www.abc.net.au/news/2011-07-25/malaysia-signs-refugee-deal/2809512

Brutus, Caesar, and Antony as Protagonists in Julius Caesar Essay examp

A protagonist is the leading character or actor in a mutant, novel, or story. The leading character of a play is non easily interpreted. A protagonist does not necessarily have to be good or bad. Determining the protagonist is one of the many savory issues presented in the play. Many characters exhibit the characteristics of a true protagonist in Julius Caesar, few stand out over on the whole others. Caesar was a compelling, courageous, yet authoritative leader who is depicted in many different ways. Brutus friend of Caesar, loves Caesar greatly but does not think he possess leadership skills. Antony is loyal, trustworthy, and a given up follower of Caesar, and proves to be a required character in Julius Caesar. All three of the protagonist must go through many highs and lows throughout the play. Brutus, Caesar, and Antony both qualify as protagonists in Julius Caesar because they all exhibit the required attributes.Caesar conquered Pompey in the beginning of his reig n, his victory captured much support of the common citizens. He grew very popular, and powerful in some people?s eyes. Caesar turned down the crown three times when it was offered to him. Caesar deals with corrupt governments, and does what will be good for everyone rather than view about one?s self. Caesar was not of ?the blood of ordinary men?3.137. What this means is that he was a powerful, understanding, leader who had became too ambitious and arrogant, which led to his necessary downfall. Caesar was arrogant in the way that on the ?Ides of swear out? he did not acknowledge the omens or the warnings of the soothsayer. There is a horrible storm on March 14 that goes on through the ?Ides of March?. His wife Calpurnia warns him not to go out because of the storm a... ...th half so good a will.5.550-52? Brutus possess all attributes of the protagonist and the play would not be the same without him. Brutus, Caesar, and Antony all qualify as protagonists in Julius Caesar b ecause they all exhibit the required attributes. A play would not be a play if there were more than one main protagonist, it would be boring and have bad dialect. While Caesar, Brutus, and Antony can all licitly be considered protagonists, Brutus is the best choice because he is actually in the entire play up to the very last scene, he has morals, and he is an honorable man. Julius Caesar was a great play it hit key points of events that actually happened. Brutus is truly an honorable man, without him the world would not be the same as we know it. Works CitedShakespeare, William. Julius Caesar. capital of Delaware Publications, Inc. New York. 2008.

Americas Ultimate Concern :: Essays Papers

Americas Ultimate ConcernThere are only a handful of universal truths to be found, and fetch up is one of them. Other than life, death, and the need for food, shelter, & order, sex and all that it entails is a fundamental and pervasive fact of human existence. Augustine knew of sex all too well. He guiltily wallowed in & enjoyed it for the majority of his life. When it comes to sex, Augustine was not genuinely different than the millions of Ameri baths who live today, some 1,500 years after him. The world is made up of approximately 7 billion males and females, all of whom are genetically and culturally wired to procreate and/or enjoy the pleasures that the sexual experience provides. Yet how does this simple scientific and psychological fact account for the unbelievable sexual statistics and facts somewhat current American and global society? How does one explain that, in a comprehensive two-year study done by Alexa Research, a lead-in web intelligence and traffic measurement service, sex was the most popular term for which people searched? Why is it that 54% of men think about sex at least every day and 19% of women think about sex at least once per day? And why, in 1998, were 87% of American high-school students having sexual intercourse? These few facts alone, as well as other obvious overwhelming evidence, should cause us to sit up and ask questions such as Why are humans, and especially Americans in this case, so obsessed with sex? Why has sex, pornography, and self-pleasure become a predominant ingredient in every-day society? Why are we not able to overcome our infatuation with sex like Augustine did? When following Augustines sexual journey through his Confessions, one can see that the only way to examine and overcome Americans obsession with sex is to understand their ultimate concerns, just as Augustine understood and re-defined his own.Augustine was course very sexual. As an adolescent he experienced the bubbling impulses of puberty that befo gged and obscured his heart so that it could not see the difference between fares serenity and lusts darkness. In his Confessions one reads of how Augustine struggled with lust and his sexuality, eventually giving wholly into a carnal lifestyle by winning a concubine at the age of 17. When he was a student at Carthage all around him hissed a cauldron of illicit loves, and from the time when he was nineteen to twenty-eight he lived a life of being seduced and seducing.

Capote/Krakauer Comparison :: essays papers

Capote/Krakauer Comparison EssayThe most important thing each source can do is to give their characters a feel ofdimension to eviscerate them seem real. Although Capote and Krakauer do that in verydifferent slipway in In Cold Blood and Into Thin Air, they both reached the same end result characters you believe. They give them feelings, faces and personalities. They dont portray everyone as flawless, they parade the faults and the unforesightful quirks. They give them life through words, making these stories believable. Despite the fact both incidents happened geezerhood before each book was written, the use of detailed facts and genius profiles make each story seem incredibly realistic. But while Capote chooses to write an entirely objective humankind, Krakauer relies heavily on personal cerebration and experience, creating cardinal very distinct frames of mind and causing the reader too see the characters in each book very differently.In 1959 the Clutter family was c arrying into actioned in a tiny Kansas town called Holcomb.Six years later Truman Capote wrote a very detailed book more or less the whole case, from the solar day of the murder to the court case prosecuting the two murderers, Dick and Perry.Although he wasnt there when the four murders happened, through word choice,description and characterization he give rises an completed portraying of the many intense events surrounding such a tragic story.In comparison, in 1996 esteemed climber Rob Hall led an despatch of evenhandedly experienced climbers attempting to climb Mt. Everest, only to result indisaster and the loss of nine peoples lives. Jon Krakauer was a member of thatexpedition, and wrote a piece to the highest degree the misadventure for Outside magazine. Feeling therewas more to be said, soon after he wrote a book. Krakauer takes a similar approach asCapote, further inserting more opinions and less of a feeling of objectiveness to hischaracters. This is most likely sinc e Krakauer was living Everest first hand, as opposed to Capote who put himself into the surroundings years later, picking up details here and there instead of relying solely on memory and friends. One of Capotes greatest strengths is to create thought for his characters, making italmost appear as if he knows what they are thinking.All summer Perry undulated between half-awake stupors and stickly, sweat-drenchedsleep. Voices roared through his head one voice persistently asked him, Where is the Nazarene? Where? And once he woke up shouting, The bird is Jesus The Bird is Jesus (381)This selection almost creates a feeling that Capote is talking about himself as opposed to a man he never met.Capote/Krakauer Comparison essays papersCapote/Krakauer Comparison EssayThe most important thing any writer can do is to give their characters a feel ofdimension to make them seem real. Although Capote and Krakauer do that in verydifferent ways in In Cold Blood and Into Thin Air, they both rea ched the same end result characters you believe. They give them thoughts, faces and personalities. They dont portray everyone as flawless, they display the faults and the little quirks. They give them life through words, making these stories believable. Despite the fact both incidents happened years before each book was written, the use of detailed facts and personality profiles make each story seem incredibly realistic. But while Capote chooses to write an entirely objective piece, Krakauer relies heavily on personal opinion and experience, creating two very distinct frames of mind and causing the reader too see the characters in each book very differently.In 1959 the Clutter family was remove in a tiny Kansas town called Holcomb.Six years later Truman Capote wrote a very detailed book about the whole case, from theday of the murder to the court case prosecuting the two murderers, Dick and Perry.Although he wasnt there when the four murders happened, through word choice,descri ption and characterization he creates an accurate portrait of the many intense events surrounding such a tragic story.In comparison, in 1996 esteemed climber Rob Hall led an expedition ofmoderately experienced climbers attempting to climb Mt. Everest, only to result indisaster and the loss of nine peoples lives. Jon Krakauer was a member of thatexpedition, and wrote a piece about the misadventure for Outside magazine. Feeling therewas more to be said, soon after he wrote a book. Krakauer takes a similar approach asCapote, yet inserting more opinions and less of a feeling of objectiveness to hischaracters. This is most likely since Krakauer was living Everest first hand, as opposed to Capote who put himself into the environment years later, picking up details here and there instead of relying solely on memory and friends. One of Capotes greatest strengths is to create thought for his characters, making italmost appear as if he knows what they are thinking.All summer Perry undulated b etween half-awake stupors and stickly, sweat-drenchedsleep. Voices roared through his head one voice persistently asked him, Where is Jesus? Where? And once he woke up shouting, The bird is Jesus The Bird is Jesus (381)This selection almost creates a feeling that Capote is talking about himself as opposed to a man he never met.

Triumph Over Nature in The Good Earth :: The Good Earth

exuberate Over Nature in The Good Earth The Good Earth, by Pearl S. Buck, is a humbug of a farmer who rises from a commoner to a wealthy land owner. The setting is pre-Revolutionary China, sometime in the 20th century. The recital is one of a farmer who be contracts a wealthy man through hard work while facing droughts and floods. He becomes very rich, only forgets his admittedly love, the earth, which got him to where he was. The mood of the figment is serious. Droughts and floods affect the outcome of crops, which in turn, affect the people who need them to survive. As the story progresses, the mood changes to become more elation hearted and careless. It is typical of todays society of how the important character becomes rich and then forgets what it was like to be on the other side. He spends money carelessly and neglects to remember how his livelihood was just a a few(prenominal) months before. The main element of the story is definitely character. We look through t he eyes of the main character and specify how he, as a person, grows and matures. There are numerous characters in the story. The first is Wang Lung, a farmer and the main character of the story. The author tells the story through his view of life. We see Wang Lung at the beginning of the story as a young man, full of energy and love for his land. He has been raised on the land he now farms and takes heavy(p) pride in maintaining it. ulterior in the story, he becomes a rich man, and forgets his land, Ones flesh and blood. As he finds out that money is not everything and cannot by happiness, he realizes his fault and returns to the earth. O-lan is Wang Lungs wife in the story. She was a slave girl raised in the great House of Hwang. Wang Lung buys her from the house, but he sees that there is no beauty of any kind in her face. But Wang Lung cannot afford a beautiful wife, for he is only a farmer. O-lan is a strong, but quite character. She bears hardships as they come and gives Wang Lung four children. Wang Lung seems to care for her, but she in return shows very little emotion. She is a hard character to reach and only before she dies, do we see the real side of O-lan.Triumph Over Nature in The Good Earth The Good EarthTriumph Over Nature in The Good Earth The Good Earth, by Pearl S. Buck, is a tale of a farmer who rises from a commoner to a wealthy land owner. The setting is pre-Revolutionary China, sometime in the 20th century. The story is one of a farmer who becomes a wealthy man through hard work while facing droughts and floods. He becomes very rich, but forgets his true love, the earth, which got him to where he was. The mood of the story is serious. Droughts and floods affect the outcome of crops, which in turn, affect the people who need them to survive. As the story progresses, the mood changes to become more light hearted and careless. It is typical of todays society of how the main character becomes rich and then forgets what it was like to be on the other side. He spends money carelessly and neglects to remember how his life was just a few months before. The main element of the story is definitely character. We look through the eyes of the main character and see how he, as a person, grows and matures. There are many characters in the story. The first is Wang Lung, a farmer and the main character of the story. The author tells the story through his view of life. We see Wang Lung at the beginning of the story as a young man, full of energy and love for his land. He has been raised on the land he now farms and takes great pride in maintaining it. Later in the story, he becomes a rich man, and forgets his land, Ones flesh and blood. As he finds out that money is not everything and cannot by happiness, he realizes his fault and returns to the earth. O-lan is Wang Lungs wife in the story. She was a slave girl raised in the great House of Hwang. Wang Lung buys her from the house, but he sees that there is no beauty of an y kind in her face. But Wang Lung cannot afford a beautiful wife, for he is only a farmer. O-lan is a strong, but quite character. She bears hardships as they come and gives Wang Lung four children. Wang Lung seems to care for her, but she in return shows very little emotion. She is a hard character to reach and only before she dies, do we see the real side of O-lan.